Dawn, a Dress, and Whose Voice?

In my search for a better understanding of the glorious Sappho, I have decided that the best place to begin is at the beginning- her first and perhaps best known fragment, the Hymn to Aphrodite.  I turned to three different authors’ translations, hoping that comparing and contrasting would lend themselves well to restoring a bit of what is lost in translation. A dmoz search yielded many different options, out of which I selected William Harris (professor of classics at Middlebury college), Elizabeth Vandiver (professor of classics at Whitman College), and Peter Saint-Andre (technologist who dabbles in classics. I thought he would provide an interesting contrast to the classics professors).  If you’d like to read along, the three translations can be found here, here, and here, respectively.

At first read, what stood out to me most was the way the word choices of each translator impacted the mood of the poem, such as the slightly different feel of “lavish” instead of “many-colored” or “iridescent”. When we are given so few words to set the scene in our minds, it’s amazing how much impact these subtle differences can have. Another good example of this is the difference between Sappho’s lover returning her love “unwillingly” and returning her love “despite herself”. “Unwillingly” sounds so much harsher than “despite herself”. Although perhaps this harshness better fits the overall theme, since the poem ends with a military reference (this military nature is clear in all three versions ). A particularly interesting note is that all three versions use the feminine pronoun for the lover, although Elizabeth Vandiver mentions in her footnotes that we cannot be certain that this is what is actually implied in the original Greek.  It was also interesting that Peter Saint-Andre did not set up lines fourteen through twenty one as a direct quote from Aphrodite. While this may have been the structure that he felt would best show us Sappho’s voice, I felt that it confused the point.

Comparing these three different versions has really made me think about the way a translator’s voice is carried into their translation. Was Sappho speaking to me through William Harris, or was William Harris speaking to me through Sappho? And what does that tell us about the translating styles we’re developing as young classics scholars ourselves? How do our own tastes and experiences play into the way we try to portray Ovid or Catullus or Cicero to modern readers?  

Happy translating, friends. 

-Elaina D.

Advertisements

One thought on “Dawn, a Dress, and Whose Voice?

  1. hopeadvancedlatin Post author

    Elaina, you make a great point about how we bring our own voices to our translations. When I was writing my poems for last semester I was clearly using my own voice, but now I realize that it is possible to incorporate your own voice even as you translate line by line. I think that the best way for us to really get to the heart of these poems is to read the actual Latin and interpret it for ourselves. We can share our translations with others, compare, contrast, and see if bringing different translations together can help us uncover what the poet was getting at. Thanks for sharing this!
    ~A. Hoffman

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s